London City Hall (September 2006)

15 Feb

London City Hall (September 2006)

(From the archives: September 2006)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

As Winston Churchill was well aware, a little theatre never hurt the political process. When Westminster was rebuilt after the Blitz, he insisted on a design for the Commons chamber that was too small for every member to get a seat at the same time. It was nothing to do with nostalgia for Pugin’s gargoyles. The decision was the product of an entirely contemporary set of political calculations.

Churchill wanted Westminster to look important. Restrict the number of seats, and you stop the place from looking yawningly empty when nothing much is happening, which is most of the time. Cram the members into every available perch and gangway for the Budget, and you get a real sense of occasion. Above all, Churchill, last of the great actor-managers of British politics, knew that democracy in action can look stupefyingly dull unless it is given a bit of help. Of course it was architectural spin-doctoring on a grand scale. But it was done long enough ago not to look too cynically manipulative.

Municipal politics in the raw still looks about as interesting as a reading from the telephone directory. There are endless procedural discussions, nit-picking points of order and for most of the day people sit in rooms, shuffle paper, talk on the phone and check their emails as if they were in a call centre.

The struggle to make something out of this deeply unpromising material is the real story of the design of London’s new City Hall.

[. . . .],,710093,00.html


Posted by on February 15, 2008 in photoblog


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

2 responses to “London City Hall (September 2006)

  1. Niels

    February 15, 2008 at 4:06 pm

    Love this shot. It has depth, contrast and let me keep looking.

    De people are a nice detail but i think they are in a worng place in the frame. More on the stairs or on a greater part before the sky (not the building) would be better i believe.


  2. kayodeok

    February 15, 2008 at 4:36 pm


    Though I am not sure they would work where you suggest because they would be in the shadows anyway; they were having a shoot there and I was waiting for them to be done so that I could shoot the City Hall but they were taking too long.

    As I recall, I was losing the light so I had no choice but to photograph them.

    They eventually did leave but the light had gone by then.

    This was back in 2006; I had passed by the Hall many times since then but either the light hasn’t been good enough for a photograph or there were too many people hanging around. It is a popular tourist spot and the Tower Bridge is just out of the frame to the left.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: